I believe all journal articles, TV, movies, music, and databases should be free. When approaching this issue one can direct attention towards the internet, considering the fact it contains all if not most of these things. I think all information no matter what form it is in, should be made public and not restricted to a limited amount of people. Things such as music albums and movies playing in theaters is another story as they are forms of revenue collection. It is also beneficiary to make this kind of mediums of information free, because it is a way to educate people on a plethora of things that one can learn from the forms of information such as research.
This is what open access refers to, making
information such as research available to the public for no monetary
compensation. It is vital that the
public be informed about issues or recent breakthroughs in science. This helps
avoid going through the issues of copyright where one potentially illegally
downloads or uses another’s content without permission. Such as issues
regarding copyright and open access are discussed in Open access research grows in popularity, where it states: "Swartz,
one of Reddit’s co-founders, illegally downloaded a great number of MIT
journals in protest of closed-access research.
Swartz was later charged with wire fraud, computer fraud and other
charges, which, if convicted, could have resulted in a maximum penalty of 50
years in prison.” Such conflicts like
this one can be avoided by making all information or at least research publicly
available.
I tend to lean towards privatizing information that people put hard work into, but you have a well thought out argument. My views may soon change.
ReplyDeleteI think it should be the way it is, some pirating goes on and people are still making good money. Its well balanced, because people who pirate would probably not even buy these at most, if pirating did not exist.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you that information should be free to the public it really makes the most sense and you had a strong argument for it.
ReplyDeleteYou make a fairly solid argument. I agree that most information should be free to access... not all but certainly more than the current climate dictates
ReplyDelete